Doctor Who’s BAFTA Award-winning Steven Moffat on the seventh series and more

An already successful writer due to previous work such as Coupling, Steven Moffat won a Hugo award for his two-part adventure ‘The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances’ for the first series of the BBC Wales Doctor Who revival. He went on to become something of a fan favorite in Doctor Who as viewers looked forward to his contributions each series. The Girl in the Fireplace, Blink and Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead also went on to earn raves from critics and fans alike.

Outside of Who, Moffat developed Jeckyll and a modern adaptation of Sherlock Holmes with fellow Doctor Who writer Mark Gattis. Today he is the man in executive producer and head writer for Doctor Who, now entering its eighth year on TV since it returned in 2005. Moffat introduced Matt Smith as the latest Doctor, a bold move at a time when fans had associated the program with David Tennant and were threatening online to ditch the series without their favorite actor on the screen.

Since his taking over Doctor Who, the program has exploded into new-found acclaim and healthy rating figures. While I crowed the excellence of his first year, I have found a substantial decline in the quality of the writing in the series for his second. With the focus moving away from the Doctor and more attention directed to the characters created by Moffat; time-tossed rake River Song and newlyweds Amy and Rory Pond, I started to worry that the program was losing interest in the lead.

The new series will be the most daring (and riskiest) yet.  The Doctor will stand alone against a universe of troubles and continue what could be the longest reign as the Doctor since Tennant’s three 1/2 year run (personally I count it as four, but most fans seem to think that the specials do not count as a series).  Could Smith be the most popular Doctor yet? Could this year erase the errors of the last?

Well… let’s look at what’s on the docket.

  • For his third outing, Moffat will not only say farewell to the Ponds, but also introduce a new companion.
  • The latest series will also open with the most ambitious Dalek story to date, rumored to be titled The Ruins of Skaro, which boasts the return of every Dalek design on screen.
  • The seventh series will have a much larger episode count.
  • Despite his decision to shy away from classic monsters, not only will the Daleks be back, but other classic monsters may also return such as the Yeti and Ice Warriors.
  • The seventh series will also culminate in a 50th anniversary special, something that has not been attempted since 1983 or 1993 (if you have a strong stomach).

Below is an excerpt for the interview centering on Doctor Who details.

Moving on to Doctor Who – how was it bidding farewell to Karen Gillan (Amy) and Arthur Darvill (Rory)?
“Oh, it’s incredibly sad. The thing you can forget about this is, while the audience are losing people that they see for a few months per year, Karen and Arthur are walking out of something that they’ve been involved with every day for years. It’s not just a professional change, it is a personal upheaval.

“I’m trying not to say it’s like being dumped, but a huge part of your life changes. I think of Karen and Arthur, and from Matt [Smith]’s point of view – people that you saw every single day and have become absolutely part of your de facto family are now gone, never ever to be in that place in your life again.

“So it’s a huge upheaval – it’s personal and it’s human. People should not underestimate how upsetting it is for everybody involved in it. I don’t mean ‘upsetting’ in the sense that it’s a tragedy – it’s not a tragedy! But it’s a huge bloody change – it’s someone moving out of your house, that’s how big it is.”

There are going to be five Doctor Who episodes in the autumn, then a Christmas special, then eight more in 2013 – what was the thinking behind that structure?
“I don’t know, on this occasion, that the thinking particularly came from me, actually. I’ve always been open to anything that shakes [the series] up. I think that decision actually came from the BBC.

“But I’ve been well up for anything that we can do to shake up the transmission pattern, the way we deliver it to the audience and how long we make the audience wait, simply because that makesDoctor Who an event piece.

“The more Doctor Who becomes a perennial, the faster it starts to die. You’ve got to shake it up, you’ve got to keep people on edge and wondering when it will come back.

Sherlock is the prime example, as far as that goes. Sherlock almost exists on starving its audience. By the time it came back this year, Sherlock was like a rock star re-entering the building!

“So keeping Doctor Who as an event, and never making people feel, ‘Oh, it’s lovely, reliable oldDoctor Who – it’ll be on about this time, at that time of year’. Once you start to do that, just slowly, it becomes like any much-loved ornament in your house – ultimately invisible. And I don’t want that to ever be the case.”

There’s been a lot of secrecy surrounding the new companion – when can we expect to learn who Jenna-Louise Coleman is playing?

“Christmas! But don’t expect to learn everything! We’ve got a good story and there are some proper legitimate surprises in it. I’m excited by it. I think we’re going to do some fun stuff.”

Are you hoping to conceal the companion’s identity until the Christmas special actually airs?
“We can’t really contain everything, because people will crawl all over us with cameras and sneak views of scripts and call-sheets. Something will get out. But we’ve been fairly sly, so let’s wait and see.

“Again, a lot of the audience that I talk to specifically avoid any spoilers and I’m absolutely certain they have a better experience of the show. As I’ve always said, if I could make it on the dark side of the moon, I would, but you can’t do these things.

“i got pilloried by somebody at some deep level of naivety about the industry – they were angry that I’d revealed the fact that Amy and Rory were even going to leave! But y’know, actor’s agents really do have to advertise their client’s availability – I had no choice but to announce they were going to leave. But in an ideal world, you wouldn’t even do that.”

And are plans for the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who under way too?
“Yes, they are. I had a meeting about that earlier in the week!”

Via DigitalSpy

7 thoughts on “Doctor Who’s BAFTA Award-winning Steven Moffat on the seventh series and more

  1. Did I miss something? How is 5 + Christmas Special + 8 episodes a “much larger episode count” for this coming series? That sounds like the exact same number of episodes for every series except the year of the specials.

    Oh, and I agree… I count that year as David Tennant’s Fourth year. There were 5 specials that year, which roughly is the same as ten 45-minute episodes… and while shorter than the normal current series, it is longer I think than some series of the classic Doctor Who.

    Oh… again… Moffat and his keep-fans-guessing-when-the-show will air as being a good thing? Really? That kills shows here in the US when people never know when to find their favorite show and eventually stop looking… or there’s an extremely long hiatus for no apparent reason and fans lose interest. Unless the UK audience is very different, I can’t imagine that surprising your fans by constantly moving the show around is a good thing.


    • I think I’m remembering Moffat saying that the next series will have at least 14 episodes, this may be referring to the 50th anniversary special, though.


      • I think I’ve read him saying that too… but 13 episodes + a Christmas special is pretty much what they’ve done every series (except the year of the specials)… so I’m not sure what is different unless he hasn’t been telling us about some more planned episodes.


  2. SJV, you are entirely right to point out that Moffat’s comment on screwing around with when the series is shown being ipso facto “a good thing” is illogical PR bulls**t. There’s nothing wrong with switching from Spring broadcast to a Fall/Winter airing but there is very much something wrong with moving it around willy-nilly (so to speak!) so that it isn’t clear when it’s going to turn up, if the keep on doing that they may will kill the show not save it. It’s odd but Moffat is pretty good at implying that modern audiences are pretty thick (but as they wildly overpraise Sherlock and even the weakest New Who stories I’m inclined to agree. Heh heh).


    • Yeah… I like how people who don’t understand Moffat stories are too “dumb” to get the “complicated” plots… but yet are going to be smart enough to solve the advanced equation necessary to figure out when the dang show is going to come on TV!🙂


  3. Yeah, it’s a puzzle wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a mediocre Lost season wrapped in a tenth-rate Saved by the Bell episode! Me no understandee genius of Meesta Moffo.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s