<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctor Who and the Lodger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailypop.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/doctor-who-and-the-lodger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailypop.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/doctor-who-and-the-lodger/</link>
	<description>Protecting Other People from wasting their leisure time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dailypop</title>
		<link>http://dailypop.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/doctor-who-and-the-lodger/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dailypop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailypop.wordpress.com/?p=6704#comment-5842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting theory on the time machine... it&#039;s such a mess of a plot, isn&#039;t it? The new series has a lot of shrug moments regarding who the monster is and what is going on, doesn&#039;t it? Ah well.

I&#039;m glad that you&#039;re enjoying Smith, esp as there has been some Tennant backlash. It&#039;s a good thing that you can appreciate both Doctors 10 and 11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting theory on the time machine&#8230; it&#8217;s such a mess of a plot, isn&#8217;t it? The new series has a lot of shrug moments regarding who the monster is and what is going on, doesn&#8217;t it? Ah well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that you&#8217;re enjoying Smith, esp as there has been some Tennant backlash. It&#8217;s a good thing that you can appreciate both Doctors 10 and 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainegendron</title>
		<link>http://dailypop.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/doctor-who-and-the-lodger/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rainegendron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailypop.wordpress.com/?p=6704#comment-5841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way I understood it, the ship on top of Craig&#039;s flat was a TARDIS, which is why it could not find a suitable &quot;human&quot; to pilot it and seized upon the Doctor at first opportunity. That whole aspect was &quot;resolved&quot; in such a sill manner, and we are never told whose ship it was, or how it ended up there.  Good work from Smith though, and yes, he does play the Doctor as being much more &quot;alien&quot; than Tennant did. I like both, but very different.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I understood it, the ship on top of Craig&#8217;s flat was a TARDIS, which is why it could not find a suitable &#8220;human&#8221; to pilot it and seized upon the Doctor at first opportunity. That whole aspect was &#8220;resolved&#8221; in such a sill manner, and we are never told whose ship it was, or how it ended up there.  Good work from Smith though, and yes, he does play the Doctor as being much more &#8220;alien&#8221; than Tennant did. I like both, but very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
